Legal Opinion

Houck v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1939No. 4-5539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

At about eleven-thirty on the morning of June 5, 1938, appellant, C. N. Houck, while returning in his automobile to Marianna, Arkansas, westwardly on highway No. 79, at a point on a curve in said highway, collided with another automobile which was being driven by a negro, Harper Rouzie. The highway was made of gravel and about twenty feet wide.

As a result of this collision, plaintiff, Lester. Marshall, suffered injuries, which were made the basis of a suit against appellants, and resulted in a substantal recovery in favor of appellee.

Appellants, on this appeal, earnestly insist, first, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kisor v. Tulsa Rendering Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
  2. Roland v. Terryland, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Strickland Transp. Co. v. GunterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Hopson Produce v. MunozSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API