Legal Opinion

Bitney v. Odegard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

While it is true that a will must be construed in accordance with the evident intention of the testator, when that intention is clearly expressed in appropriate language the instrument admits of no construction. Estate of Allis (1926), 191 Wis. 23, 209 N. W. 945, 210 N. W. 418; Will of Trautwein (1932), 208 Wis. 107, 241 N. W. 334.

The argument that the words of the second paragraph “and to her heirs and assigns forever” are words of substitution is ingenious but tenuous. From time immemorial, even under the rule of Shelley’s Case, these words whether used in a will or a deed have been held to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Harrison v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Trautwein v. ClarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoermann v. HoermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Estate of Mangel v. StrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Sattell v. BrennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API