Legal Opinion
Ampadu v. Capital One
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 21, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00828Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT FRIMPONG AMPADU, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:21-cv-828 (JAM) CAPITAL ONE, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff Frimpong Ampadu has filed a pro se complaint alleging that defendant Capital One violated multiple federal laws in connection with two of Ampadu’s credit card accounts.1 Capital One has now moved to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Ampadu has not filed any objection or other response to the motion to dismiss. Because the complaint fails to allege facts that give rise to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Walker v. SchultCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.