Legal Opinion

Clifton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1904No. 2896PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Milam. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Scott. Appeal from a conviction of incest; ]jenalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This is a conviction of incest, the punishment assessed being confinement in the penitentiary for a term^ of five years. The prosecutrix is the niece and stepdaughter of appellant. With reference to the attitude of the prosecutrix as an accomplice, the court left it as a matter of fact to be determined by the jury; and the criterion upon which it turned under the charge was if she entered into the sexual intercourse with the same intent which actuated defendant, she would be an accomplice. This she denied, and affirmed that she did not do so. On this point she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Ball v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bushell v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API