Legal Opinion

American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Blodgett

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 30, 1940Published

1Per curiam

Even though the words “ costs and damages ” under the context of the undertaking here might be interpreted to *817include appellant’s disbursements upon appeal, the use of the words “ costs and disbursements ” provides the acceptable form. Section 159 of the Municipal Court Code requires the payment of “ all costs and disbursements awarded against him on the appeal.” In any event, plaintiff appellant’s exception should have been sustained and justification of sureties disallowed as surety Kremsdorf’s testimony was insufficient in respect of his own worth and insufficient and incompetent in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manning v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Montrose v. BaggottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Goldmark v. Magnolia Metal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. 898 West End Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Haines v. HeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API