Legal Opinion

Palm Springs La Quinta Development Co. v. Kieberk Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1940No. Civ. 11329PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff sued for declaratory relief and for an injunction. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained with leave to amend, and at the same time the trial court dissolved the temporary restraining order. The appeal is taken from the portion of the order reading “Restraining order is dissolved. ’ ’

One Kiener had an exclusive sales contract to sell land owned by the Big Bear Land and Water Company. Later he obtained an exclusive sales contract to sell land owned by the Palm Springs Land and Irrigation Company. In these activities he had developed a card index system amounting to about…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stockton v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. O'Shea v. Tile Layers UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Sharpe v. BrotzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Killeen v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees' International Alliance & Bartenders' International LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Balian v. Balian's MarketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API