Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1960No. 2 Div. 21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The indictment is for a felony, i. e., transporting five or more gallons of prohibited liquors.

The judgment entry shows a plea of guilty, but omits any reference to allocutus by the court to the prisoner.

In a felony case, such an enquiry is mandatory. Under Code 1940, T. 15, § 389, we are required to notice this record error. The error, however, is not cause for reversal, but only for remandment to the court below for proper sentencing. Smith v. State, 28 Ala.App. 506, 189 So. 86.

Accordingly, the judgment below is hereby ordered to be affirmed, but remanded for proper sentence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maul v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  2. McCray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Bryant v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Swicegood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Simmons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API