Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Village of Ossining

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrank S. McCullough, J.

This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

*857The complaint alleges that the plaintiff sustained injuries when he stepped upon a manhole cover in the Village of Ossining and that the cover gave way causing the plaintiff to fall into the manhole. The injuries are attributed by the plaintiff to the negligence of the Village of Ossining and its Superintendent of Highways.

The motion to dismiss is based on the conceded lack of written…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez v. Village of OssiningNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ocasio v. City of MiddletownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Carr v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API