Donahue v. CTL Distribution
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge
Although I concur in most of the majority’s decision, I write to express my disagreement with that portion affirming the application of deemed earnings for the period from September 30, 1994, through October 31, 1994. I would reverse the application of deemed earnings for that one-month period, because the employer and its insurance carrier (collectively, the E/C) failed to satisfy their burden in regard to the application of the deemed earnings provision.
The evidence was undisputed that Donahue could not return to his former employment as a truck driver because of his compensable injuries.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tampa Elec. Co. v. BradshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Bado v. Canteen Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Bright v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Hyatt Regency Westshore v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Delchamps v. PageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.