Legal Opinion

Leathem Smith-Putnam Navigation Co. v. Osby

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 7, 1935No. 5303PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Appellees, members of the crew of a motor vessel, Material Service, filed suits at law to recover, under the Jones Act, § 1, 46 USCA § 688, damages for injuries resulting from an explosion upon the .boat, on November 30, 1930, about 10 a. m. while it was proceeding up the Illinois Drainage Canal. Appellant filed its petition for exemption from, and limitation of, liability, as owner of the vessel, and the court restrained the suits at law. Answers and claims for damages in behalf of each of the appellees and one Delia Embury, an invitee, were filed. The District Court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Austerberry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  2. Koehler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  3. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Repsholdt v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Kulack v. the Pearl JackDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API