Legal Opinion

(PC) Howell v. Munoz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 1, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00048Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:23-cv-00048-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HIS APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN 11 v. FORMA PAUPERIS SHOULD NOT BE DENIED BECAUSE HE CAN AFFORD TO 12 PAY THE FILING FEE E. MUNOZ, et al., 13 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE 14 DISMISSED BECAUSE HIS ALLEGATION OF POVERTY IS UNTRUE AND HE 15 KNOWINGLY PROVIDED INACCURATE INFORMATION 16 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Kareem Howell (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Attwood v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Frank Thomas v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Bennie R. Thompson v. Norman CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Eckert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API