Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

De Vesa v. Dorsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 23, 1993Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHandler, J.

At issue in this case is the constitutionality of senatorial courtesy, a practice that allows a single senator who resides in or represents any portion of the county in which a nominee is domiciled to veto the appointment without further action by the Senate. Most recently, the practice of senatorial courtesy was threatened to block the reappointment of Judge Marianne Espinosa Murphy to the Superior Court. This suit was filed challenging the constitutionality of the practice of senatorial courtesy and its attempted exercise with respect to Judge Murphy’s nomination.

I conclude that the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API