Legal Opinion
Curtiss v. County of Livingston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied in part and complaint against defendants County of Livingston and John M. York reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint against defendants County of Livingston (County) and John M. York. "[T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, 64 NY2d 851; Zuckerman v City of New…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Marashian v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Woods v. Town of TonawandaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020