Oglesby & Oglesby v. Aaron
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
1. The provision in the act of the General Assembly creating the city court of Statesboro, “In suits returnable to the monthly term defense must be made as such defenses are required to be made in the superior courts of this State, upon the first day of the term to which they are made returnable,” does not include defenses to attachments and declarations filed thereon. Ga. L. 1903, pp. 153, 162, § 38; Fincher v. Stanley Electric Manufacturing Co., 127 Ga. 362 (56 S. E. 440); Harrison v. Wilson Lumber Co., 119 Ga. 6 (45 S. E. 730).
2. Said act provides (§ 13) : “In all matters pertaining to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harrison & Garrett v. Wilson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Fincher v. Stanley Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Fort-Mims & Haynes Co. v. Branan-Akers Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pace v. Radcliff Memorial Church Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Pace v. Radcliff Memorial Presbyterian Church Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948