Commonwealth v. Meo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
These are consolidated appeals from appellants’ judgments of sentence for possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) with intent to manufacture. Appellants contend that (1) there was insufficient evidence introduced at trial to show that they possessed the methamphetamine; (2) evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant should have been suppressed because (a) the probable cause affidavit supporting the warrant was insufficient and (b) the execution of the search warrant was defective because the police did not wait a reasonable period of time before forcibly entering…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WicksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. KontosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. FrenchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. HallockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. VanderlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.