Garza v. Serrato

I respectfully dissent.

Initially appellants complain of the court’s denial of the motion to quash notice of deposition of Dr. Luis Gonzalez Rios and for a protective order in connection therewith. They further contend that the video tape testimony of Dr. Luis Gonzalez Rios was incompetent and erroneously admitted in evidence, over objection, and that Dr. *282Rios’ opinion testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay.

TEX.R.CIV.P. 215c (Vernon 1976) provides:

Rule 215c. Non-Stenographic Recording

Any party may cause the testimony and other available evidence at a deposition to be recorded by…