Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Engineering & Equipment Co. v. Wyatt

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided June 10, 1959No. 453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARSWELL, Chief Judge.

This proceeding was initiated under the Miller Act (40 U.S.C.A. § 270b) to recover the unpaid balance for plumbing supplies. The claim by a materialman seeks recovery against the prime contractor and upon the bond of the latter’s surety for failure of the subcontractor (with whom the use plaintiff dealt) to pay for the materials furnished in con*261nection with the latter’s contract with the prime contractor. In their answers the prime contractor and the surety interposed the defense that more than 90 days had elapsed between the furnishing of the last materials and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Altman v. Young Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. United States Ex Rel. Greenwald-Supon, Inc. v. Gramercy Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  3. United States v. Greene Electrical Service of Long Island, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966
  4. United States ex rel. Palmer Asphalt Co. v. DebardelabenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  5. United States ex rel. Pre-Fab Erectors, Inc. v. A. B. C. Roofing & Siding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API