Hill v. State

ON REHEARING.

January 16, 1924.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant made no motion to quash the indictment herein. After conviction he made a motion for new trial on February 27th couched in the most general terms and making no attack upon the indictment at all. On March 9th following appellant filed an amended motion for new trial at the end of which apuears a complaint that the allegation in the indictment referred to “a pot or boiler” and that this is an alternative pleading. The motion for rehearing herein is based altogether on the proposition that the court erred in overruling a motion in arrest…