Legal Opinion
Feng v. Sandrik
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 1986No. 85 C 7111PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Pro se plaintiffs Paul Feng (“Paul”) and Marie Feng (“Marie”) brought this sex-discrimination action against defendants Loyola University of Chicago (“Loyola”), unnamed individual members of Loyola’s Board of Trustees and Lay Board of Trustees and several Loyola employees (“the individual defendants”). The Fengs seek compensatory and punitive damages plus equitable relief in their three-count complaint alleging sex-based salary disparities and retaliatory actions taken by defendants against Marie for complaining about those disparities. Loyola…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Allen v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Pommier v. James L. Edelstein EnterprisesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Dahl v. FEDERAL LAND BANK ASS'N.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Patton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Bertoncini v. SchrimpfDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.