Hyde v. Chrysler Corp.

In an action grounded, inter alia, in strict products liability, the defendant Chrysler Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), dated November 25, 1987, as denied those branches of its motion which were for further discovery and inspection of a certain automobile, and to compel the plaintiff to provide supplemental responses to interrogatories numbered 24 and 26.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Since the appellant has availed itself of the opportunity to inspect the vehicle…