Legal Opinion
Danks v. Quackenbush
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1848PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On error to the supreme court to review a judgment of that court reversing one rendered by the Onondaga common pleas. For a report of the case see 1 Denio, 128. The question was whether the act exempting certain property from distress for rent and sale under execution, (Stat. 1842, p. 193,) constitutionally extended to contracts existing when the act was passed. The supreme court held that it did not.
1Opinion of the Court
The cause having been argued by counsel, and time having been taken for deliberation, the judgment of the supreme court was affirmed.
2Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of PellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- People, Ex Rel. Collins v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Hill v. . KesslerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
- Deering v. BoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Savage v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.