Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 2000No. 2D99-4567Published

1ConcurrenceAltenbernd, Acting Chief Judge

I fully concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s order summarily denying this motion. I am not convinced, however, that Richardson has any right to file yet another postconviction motion. In 1988, she was sentenced on a plea of guilty to five years’ imprisonment, followed by ten years’ probation. There is no question that the written sentence was a probationary split sentence.

In 1990, she was sentenced on a violation of probation to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. She appealed that sentence and it was affirmed. See Richardson v. State, 619 So.2d 963 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). In 1998, she…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dawson/Knapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API