Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. State

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1934No. 1799-6377Published

1Opinion of the Court

CRITZ, Commissioner.

This suit was instituted in the district corrrt of Dallas county, Tex., by Mrs. E. L. Moberly against G. A. and Ernest Eproson and Detroit Fidelity & Surety Company. The litigation grew out of a road construction contract between the state of Texas, acting through the Highway Commission, and E. Eproson & Co., a firm composed of Ernest and G. A. Eproson and one R. B. Truett. Truett is dead and his estate insolvent. ITe is therefore not sued. The Fidelity Company is sued as surety on the Eproson & Company bond.

After the filing of the suit by Mrs. Moberly, notice was given as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. McDaniel v. National Steam Laundry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hunt v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API