Legal Opinion

People v. Slide

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*882The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence (see People v Hernandez, 110 AD3d 919, 919 [2013]). Furthermore, the “rare case” exception to the preservation rule does not apply here, since the defendant’s plea allocution did not cast significant doubt upon his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of the plea (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988];…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. TyrellNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. WordenNew York Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SlideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. CalisteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API