Legal Opinion

In re the Complaint of Latimer

Judicial Council of The Fifth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On November 4, 1991, Thomas L. and Carol Latimer filed a complaint against Judge Barefoot Sanders pursuant to the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980, 28 U.S.C. § 372(c). Pursuant to § 372(c)(2), the complaint was referred to Chief Judge Charles Clark and by him certified to a special investigating committee composed of the said Chief Judge, Circuit Judges W. Eugene Davis and Jerry E. Smith, and District Judges William Wayne Justice and Neal Biggers. That committee reported to the Council a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed on the basis that it did not raise a matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,749 Thomas Latimer, Et Ux, Carol Latimer v. Smithkline & French Laboratories, a Division of Smithkline Beckman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Health Services Acquisition Corp. v. John A. Liljeberg, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. In Re Charge of Judicial MisconductCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Complaint of Thomas L. And Carol Latimer Against United States Chief District Judge Barefoot Sanders Under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980. Judicial Council of the Fifth CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API