United States v. Jack Randell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Chief Judge:
This application for bail pending appeal calls upon us to interpret that portion of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, tit. II, 98 Stat.1976, that conditions such release upon a finding that the appeal “raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in reversal or an order for a new trial.” Id. at § 203, 98 Stat.1982 (to be codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3143). Because the proper interpretation of this section is an issue of first impression in this court, we believe it appropriate to decide the motion in a published opinion rather than by order.
I
Jack…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Francis Martin Giancola and Charles A. Pifer, IICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. TillemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph DisommaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Mark Allan BaykoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- State v. Scott Robertson(075326)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.