Legal Opinion

Max J. Kuney, Jr., and Constance F. Kuney v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1975No. 72-2622PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before LUMBARD, * MERRILL and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

This is the third occasion on which we have considered the Kuney family partnership, the trusts created of partnership interests 1 and the tax consequences of the manner in which a division of income has thus been accomplished.

Section 704(e)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 704(e)(1), dealing with family partnerships, recognizes that a partnership interest can, for .tax purposes, be created by gift.

“Recognition of interest created by purchase or gift. — A person shall be recognized as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Max Kuney, Jr., and Constance K. Kuney, His Wife Max J. Kuney, Sr., Olive R. Kuney v. William E. Frank, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Max J. Kuney, Jr., and Constance K. Kuney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William E. Neely and Irene R. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. McA Inc. And Universal City Studios, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API