Legal Opinion
Defenders of Wildlife v. Dalton
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 18, 2000No. Slip Op. 00-42; Court 00-02-00060PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The motion before the court challenges the affirmative finding by defendant, 1 Penelope. D. Dalton, that Mexico is in compliance with the International Dolphin Conservation Protection Act’s requirements; and therefore, that the embargo against tuna from Mexico’s vessels in the Eastern Pacific ocean should be lifted. See Notice Concerning Affirmative Finding for Mexico at 1 (filed Apr. 13, 2000). Plaintiffs allege irreparable injury from the likely extinction of three depleted stocks of dolphins. On April 12, 2000, the Court held an evidentiary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Zenith Radio Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- S. J. Stile Associates Ltd. v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Defenders of Wildlife v. HogarthUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Turtle Island Restoration Network v. MallettUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Defenders of Wildlife v. DaltonUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000