Legal Opinion
Coppola v. Di Benedetto
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 5, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
The complaint sets forth a cause of action by an attorney for professional services rendered to defendant between November 15, 1921, and June 16, 1922, at her special instance and request, and alleges both the agreed and reasonable value of such services to have been $1,500. The proposed fourth amended answer contains substantially a general denial with an additional statement that if plaintiff is entitled to any payment for' services, the amount claimed is unreasonable; and as a separate defense and counterclaim that in the month of February, 1922, the plaintiff acted as an attorney for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gates v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
- Dickinson v. . TysenNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- 137 East 66th Street, Inc. v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- Empire Dairy Feed Co. v. Chatham National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zysman v. 147 & 149 West 57th Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1927