Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Crossett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 13, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Potter County Court; W. M. Jeter, Judge. Action by Don A. Crossett against Frank Mitchell. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appellee instituted this suit in the county court of Potter county against appellant to recover commissions, alleged to be due him upon the sale of part of a certain section of land. Appellant listed the land with appellee for sale at $40 per acre, agreeing to pay 5 per cent, commission therefor. Appellee, in his efforts to dispose of the land, learned that the American-Canadian Land Company had some prospective purchasers for lands of the kind and character of that listed with him by appellant. He procured the Texas agent for-said company to inspect the lands, and the parties composing said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bemus v. BemusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Ross v. MoskowitzTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Luhn v. FordtranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Clark v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capitol Hotel Co. v. RittenberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Haskell v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Brooks v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Oliver v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Sherwin-Williams Paint Co. v. RausinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API