Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 21, 1972No. 72 Civ. 628PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLACK, District Judge.

This is an action pursuant to § 13 of the Food Stamp Act of 1964, 7 U.S.C. § 2022(c), for a trial de novo review of a determination by the Food Stamp Review Officer under 7 U.S.C. § 2020 disqualifying plaintiff’s store at 71 Avenue D in New York City from participating in the Food Stamp Program for a period of six months for violation of the Act and the applicable administrative regulations. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 65(a) was consolidated with the trial of the action on the merits.

The plaintiff complains of the quantum of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. William L. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Save More of Gary, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Thomas J. Maxwell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elsie Inez Goodman, Owner Goodman's Drive-In Grocery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Charles M. Modica, D/B/A G & D Grocery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. H. T. Saunders, D/B/A Saunders Dispensary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Berger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976
  5. M. R. Damiani Corp. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API