Legal Opinion
Estate of Casimir Machowski v. Inland Wetlands Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 2012No. AC 33710PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiff estate of Casimir Machowski1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing *832its appeal from the decision of the defendant inland wetlands commission of the city of Ansonia (commission),2 denying the plaintiff a permit to conduct regulated activities on a parcel of real estate. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly applied the substantial evidence test in its review of the reasons given by the commission for denying the plaintiffs application. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Retirement Management Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Tax Funding, LLC v. Design Land Developers of Newtown, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Three Levels Corp. v. Conservation Commission of ReddingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Cohen v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022