Legal Opinion

People v. Emigh

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1959No. Crim. 2975PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Howard I. Emigh was charged with three violations of section 476a of the Penal Code. Each count of the information charged a prior conviction of forgery. At the time of the arraignment the public defender was appointed to represent Mm. The public defender waived the arraignment, the reading of the information, and a statement of the defendant’s rights. The defendant then entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity to Count III of the information and specifically entered a plea of guilty to Count III and admitted the prior conviction. Counts I and II of the information were then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. GilliamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. ClarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Crosby v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Strode v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. MullaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API