Legal Opinion

Plank-Road Co. v. Ramage

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error, to the Common Pleas of Allegheny county.

1Opinion of the Court

In the case of the same Plank-Road Company v. Ramage, the opinion of the Court, delivered by Black, C. J., was as follows:

It has been settled in the Plank-Road Company v. Thomas, that a party injured by the location of a plank-road, has a right, under the general act and its supplements, to recover damages *96for land taken as well as improvements destroyed. Timber is part of the land. The other points are not greater or more numerous than might be raised in any ease, however justly decided, in which ingenious counsel determine to take as many exceptions as possible.

The necessity of making new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. M'Clenachan v. CurwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1802

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M'Clenachan v. CurwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1802
  2. Dietrich v. DaviesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Philadelphia Housewrecking Co. v. NolenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API