Legal Opinion
McCurdy v. Arkansas State Police
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided August 4, 2003No. 4:02-cv-00542Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
EISELE, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiff has responded and the Defendant has filed a reply brief. The Court is now prepared to rule. The Defendant’s motion will be granted.
I. Introduction
The Plaintiff is employed by the Arkansas State Police as a non-commissioned police radio dispatcher. On August 29, 2002, she filed suit against the Arkansas State Police and the State of Arkansas contending that she was discriminated against on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Constance Chaix INDEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FREEMAN DECORATING, INC. and Larry Arnaudet, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Essalene Lambert v. City of DumasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Kneibert v. Thomson Newspapers, Michigan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.