Littlefield v. Cupps
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment granting a Rule 60 (b) motion to set aside a judgment. We affirm.
As a preface to our opinion we explain that the 60 (b) motion was granted upon the ground that the judgment sought to be set aside was void. We have previously said that the granting of a Rule 60 (b) motion is an interlocutory order and not appealable. Sullivan v. Speedway Oil Company, 352 So.2d 1383 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977). However, we consider that when the motion to set aside is granted upon the ground that the original judgment was void for want of jurisdiction or authority, the grant of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sullivan v. Speedway Oil Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chambers County Com'rs v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Ex Parte Trinity Automotive Services, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Nix v. CassidyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Tanana v. AlexanderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.