Legal Opinion

Smith v. Richmond

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 9, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 37 — Action by W. B. Smith against M. J. Richmond and Othebs to Recover Money from His Associate Contributed to Procure Immunity from Prosecution for Bribery — Dec. 9. APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Defendants and Plaintiff Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

JUDGE. GUPPY

— Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Kenton circuit court in the suit of the appellant against the appellees. The court having sustained a demurrer to the petition as amended, and appellant failing to plead further, his action was dismissed.

The sole question presented for decision is whether the petition as amended stated a cause of action, or, in other words, whether, upon appellant’s own showing, he was entitled to relief from a court of equity. So much of the petition as is material to plaintiff’s cause of action reads as follows: “(21 Now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  2. Central Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. RespassCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fears v. United Loan & Deposit BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Chapman v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Feltner v. FeltnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API