Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Shideler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1923No. 11625PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Defendant in error, Shideler, brought this action against plaintiffs in error, as a partnership, pud against each member thereof, for $220, alleged to be due him from said firm under an oval contract to pay him a bonus of $20 for each Maxwell car sold by him.

The Thompson Motor Oar Company, plaintiff in error, was distributor for Maxwell cans in this state; Shideler was a car dealer, and as such made a dealer’s contract in writing with said distributor, Thompson Motor Oar 'Company, to sell Maxwell cars. Shideler’s place of business was Stillwater, Okla.; the Thompson Motor Car Company, at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. BrosseauIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Strickler v. GitchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Sternburg v. Callanan & InghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Peters & Reed v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  5. Shamburg v. RugglesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacKey v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. State ex rel. Moore v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API