Thompson v. Shideler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Defendant in error, Shideler, brought this action against plaintiffs in error, as a partnership, pud against each member thereof, for $220, alleged to be due him from said firm under an oval contract to pay him a bonus of $20 for each Maxwell car sold by him.
The Thompson Motor Oar Company, plaintiff in error, was distributor for Maxwell cans in this state; Shideler was a car dealer, and as such made a dealer’s contract in writing with said distributor, Thompson Motor Oar 'Company, to sell Maxwell cars. Shideler’s place of business was Stillwater, Okla.; the Thompson Motor Car Company, at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. BrosseauIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Strickler v. GitchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Sternburg v. Callanan & InghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Peters & Reed v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
- Shamburg v. RugglesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MacKey v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- State ex rel. Moore v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964