Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Lett

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 28, 1980No. ACM 22557Published

1DissentMiles, Judge

I agree that the defense of accident or misadventure was not reasonably raised by the evidence and thus the accused was not entitled to an instruction thereon. The accused’s carrying the switch blade knife into the club, and drawing it when the victim confronted him, were deliberate acts, a foreseeable consequence of which might be death or injury of patrons of the club. United States v. Fammer, 14 U.S.C.M.A. 358, 34 C.M.R. 138 (1963). But at most, the accused under these circumstances would be guilty of involuntary manslaughter, a significantly different offense from that for which he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. FemmerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. LewandowskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API