Legal Opinion
Randall v. LACONIA, NH
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 8, 2012No. 11-1412PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Federal law requires home sellers to alert potential home buyers to the pres*3ence of lead-based paint hazards. The City of Laconia, New Hampshire sidestepped this requirement when it sold Jameson Randall his house. Some years later, after learning that lead-based paint was present in his home, Randall filed suit. The sole question is whether his lawsuit is time-barred. We agree with the district court that it is, and therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
In 1998, the appellee, the City of Laconia (the “City” or “Laconia”), purchased a house located at 192 Elm Street in Laconia…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Merck & Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gorelik v. Costin, Pa-CCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Quality Cleaning Products R.C., Inc. v. SCA Tissue North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Abdallah v. Bain Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Jardín De Las Catalinas Ltd. Partnership v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Walbridge ex rel. Situated v. DoeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- United States v. Romero-GalindezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.