Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 25, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Elmer Tinsley, was jointly indicted with his brother, Gilbert Tinsley, for the offense of grand larceny. Gilbert Tinsley, upon a separate trial, was convicted of that crime and received two years in the penitentiary.' We affirmed the judgment on an appeal by him in Tinsley v. Commonwealth, Ky., 261 S.W.2d 11. Appellant was thereafter tried and convicted on the same charge and the punishment imposed by the jury was confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of one year.

Reversal of the judgment is sought: (1) Because of the failure to grant a change of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Hannah v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Tinsley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rigsby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  2. Ohio River Sand Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  3. Fible v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  4. Castle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971
  5. Ohio River Sand Company v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API