Legal Opinion

Shotts v. Pardi

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 31, 1972No. 730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This was a suit by holder of a check against the drawer after payment of the check had been stopped. The drawer filed exceptions to the plaintiffs petition, contending that the payee-indorser of the check was a necessary party to the suit. Upon the holder’s refusal to make the payee-in-dorser a party, the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s suit. Whereupon, the holder appealed to this Court.1

Mack Shotts, who operates a business under the name of Mack Shotts Truck Stop in the City of Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought suit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Swinford v. Allied Finance Company of Casa ViewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Zimmerman v. BondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Full Gospel Assemblies in Christ v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Trinity, Texas v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Bryan v. Citizens National Bank in AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API