Shotts v. Pardi
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This was a suit by holder of a check against the drawer after payment of the check had been stopped. The drawer filed exceptions to the plaintiffs petition, contending that the payee-indorser of the check was a necessary party to the suit. Upon the holder’s refusal to make the payee-in-dorser a party, the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s suit. Whereupon, the holder appealed to this Court.1
Mack Shotts, who operates a business under the name of Mack Shotts Truck Stop in the City of Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, brought suit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Swinford v. Allied Finance Company of Casa ViewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Zimmerman v. BondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Full Gospel Assemblies in Christ v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- First National Bank of Trinity, Texas v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Bryan v. Citizens National Bank in AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981