Legal Opinion

City of Beverly Hills v. Venoco, LLC (In re Venoco, LLC)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 31, 2017No. Case No. 17-10828 (KG); Adv. Pro. No. 17-50483 (KG)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J.

The City of Beveply Hills, California and the Beverly Hills Unified School District (the “School District”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”)1 have moved for a preliminary injunction (the “Motion”) against Venoco, LLC (“Venoco”) Dpbtor-in-possession and Defendant. The precise relief the Plaintiffs seek is an Order:(1) Directing Venoco to remain on, monitor, and maintain tjie site (discussed within) until the earliest of the following: (a) Venoco has satisfactorily complied with the Plug and Abandon Order issued by DOGGR and the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
Frank E. Acierno v. New Castle CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
Ecri, a Nonprofit Pennsylvania Corporation v. McGraw Inc., McGraw Information Systems Co., and McGraw Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.