Legal Opinion

Geren & Hamond v. Lawson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1919No. Nos. 2267, 2268PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to District Court, Otero county; Mecller, Judge. Separate actions by Geren & Hamond and by E. D. McKinley against one Dernier, witli garnishment against J. L. Lawson. Judgments against garnishee in justice court, and he appealed to district court, wherein his motion for a dismissal of cases was granted, and plaintiff in each case brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

RAYNOLDS, J.

The facts in these two cases are identical, except as to the amounts involved. Plaintiffs in error brought garnishment proceedings against defendant in error, Lawson, and obtained a judgment against him in the justice court, he appealed to the district court, and, upon his motion for a dimissal of the cases in the district court being granted, plaintiffs in error appealed to this court. No process was issued of served upon Dernier, the defendant below. He did not enter his appearance, waive service, nor was he made a party by publication or otherwise.

[1] ¥e…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pointer v. LewisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davidson v. EnfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Galindo v. Western States Collection CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. McCann v. McCannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Postal Finance Company v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API