Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Weaver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 2008Published

1Dissent

Stein, J. (dissenting).

The question of whether the NY Constitution prohibits constant surveillance of an individual’s whereabouts by means of a global positioning system (hereinaf*144ter GPS) device without a search warrant has far-reaching implications and has never been addressed by any appellate court of this state. While I agree that an analysis under federal law would dictate the result reached by the majority (see New York v Class, 475 US 106, 113-114 [1986]; United States v Knotts, 460 US 276 [1983]; United States v Rascon-Ortiz, 994 F2d 749, 754 [10th Cir 1993]; see also People v Jackson,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. New York v. ClassSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API