Legal Opinion
Acero v. Berryhill
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00846Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICARDO A., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00846-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING JOINT MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW 13 v. AND REMANDING FOR 14 ANDREW SAUL, IMMEDIATE AWARD OF Commissioner of Social Security, BENEFITS 15 Defendant. 16 [ECF No. 13] 17 On November 26, 2019, Ricardo Acero (“Plaintiff”) and Andrew Saul 18 (Commissioner of Social Security) (“Commissioner”) filed a Joint Motion for Judicial 19 Review of Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Joint Motion”) 20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.