Legal Opinion

McNatt v. City of Orlando

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 16, 1988No. 88-536PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

McNatt, a plaintiff and defendant in consolidated cases below, petitions for writ of certiorari to review an order granting the city of Orlando’s motion to compel production of witness statements.

Petitioner alleges the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in ordering the production because the statements “invaded the work product privilege and/or attorney-client privilege.” We cannot issue our writ based upon a bald assertion of that kind. It must be somehow demonstrated in the record that the statement would constitute such a violation. Here there is no…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. HALIFAX HOSPITAL MED. CENT. v. RyalsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Church of Scientology Flag Service v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API