Camacho v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
Felix Camacho appeals his sentences, arguing that the trial court erred by concluding that it had no legal basis to grant a downward departure. In Banks v. State, 732 So.2d 1065 (Fla.1999), the Supreme Court of Florida created a two-step process for deciding whether to impose a downward departure sentence. These two steps are analyzed with at least three different standards of review on appeal. As a result, to facilitate review, it is very helpful for the trial court to explain on the record the precise basis for a decision to depart or not to depart from the guidelines when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Kezal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- John Henry Fogarty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Joseph M. MiliciDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Childers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- William Lee Rudd v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- MARIA HIRALDO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Dawson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.