Legal Opinion
Hefner v. Republic Indemnity Co. of America
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 17, 1991No. Civ. A. H-89-2399PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HUGHES, District Judge.
1. Introduction.
Robert Hefner seeks to recover as a third-party beneficiary against two insurance companies under policies issued to Byron Lasky. Lasky is a limited partner of a Texas partnership that owns, among other properties, the apartment complex where Hefner was injured. Mutual Fire Marine and Inland Insurance Company, La-sky’s primary insurance carrier, is in liquidation and will be dismissed. Hefner will take nothing against Republic Indemnity Company of America, the excess liability carrier, because Hefner is not a third party…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Great American Insurance Company v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. National Emergency Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Snydergeneral Corp. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- TV-3, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- Insurance Co. of North America v. McCarthy Bros. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.