Legal Opinion

RUSSO v. VALMET INC

District Court, D. Maine

Decided January 29, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00324Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL RUSSO, ) ) PLAINTIFF ) ) V. ) CIVIL NO. 19-CV-324-DBH ) VALMET INC. AND VALMET, INC. ) DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN, ) ) DEFENDANTS ) DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS This is a lawsuit seeking retirement benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. The plaintiff claims his employer’s defined benefit plan has wrongly denied him benefits even though he meets the plan’s definition of “eligible employee.” He also claims a breach of fiduciary duty, alleging that he took the job in reliance on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Beddall v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API